Question 1

"Women still earn less. Fix that first."

Accepted Answer

The pay gap is real, documented, and worth closing. Disadvantage is not one queue where the sexes wait in line. Women lead the deficits in pay and power; men lead the deficits in death, suicide, workplace fatality, lifespan. Machinery should follow the data in both directions at the same time. In short: Both gaps are real. Fixing one was never conditional on ignoring the other.

Question 2

"Isn't this manosphere stuff?"

Accepted Answer

A corner of the internet monetises male grievance and blames women for it. We want nothing to do with it. The manosphere sells resentment. This page asks statistics agencies to count and governments to publish strategies, sourced to the UN, WHO, OECD and Eurostat. Norway did it by royal resolution; Melinda French Gates funds it. And nobody here is selling anything: no course, no membership, no merch, a free page with a source register at the bottom. In short: The manosphere blames women. We ask statistics agencies to count men.

Question 3

"Men already run the world."

Accepted Answer

Presidents, CEOs, billionaires, mostly men. Power at the top is real. The men at the top are not the men at the bottom. Power at the apex says nothing about pain at the base: the 93.5% of workplace-death victims and three in four deaths of despair are not CEOs. In short: The man in the boardroom is not the man on the scaffolding.

Question 4

"Just make your own organisations."

Accepted Answer

We did. Manderådet and MannsForum exist. So do fathers' groups and men's health forums, in many countries. Volunteers cannot write treaties, add SDG indicators or mandate national statistics. That is exactly why the women's movement, correctly, demanded state and UN machinery instead of relying on charity. Same logic. Same ask. In short: Charity built the shelters. Machinery built the rights. Men have only the charity.

Question 5

"This will take money from women."

Accepted Answer

Budgets are finite, and the fear that new causes eat old ones is reasonable. Read the five asks: one is a pair of recognitions that cost nothing, one is a data column. Norway adopted 35 measures while keeping its roughly NOK 690 million annual support to UN Women and UNFPA unchanged. And we say it verbatim, three times on this page: we do not propose reducing UN Women's budget. In short: A second column, not a slice of the first.

Question 6

"Men do it to themselves, risk-taking, not seeing doctors."

Accepted Answer

Behaviour is part of every health statistic, men's included. We stopped closing files on women's health by calling their outcomes choices, the same standard applies here. A boy behind in reading at age ten chose nothing. Services shaped without men in mind are precisely what men's health strategies exist to fix; Ireland showed how in 2008. In short: We retired “her own fault” decades ago. Same rule, both sexes.

Question 7

"Gender equality already covers everyone, it's in the name."

Accepted Answer

The titles are neutral: gender equality, gender mainstreaming, EIGE's own mandate. The instruments are one-directional. SDG 5's text is 'all women and girls'; its fourteen indicators measure one direction; the 234-indicator framework never treats men or boys as the group falling behind. A neutral label on a one-way gauge. In short: The title says gender. The indicators measure one direction.

Question 8

"What about violence against women?"

Accepted Answer

Women are the majority of intimate-partner victims, and the treaties protecting them are justified. 81% of all homicide victims are men. Her greatest risk is at home; his is everywhere else. Both facts deserve infrastructure, today only one has treaties, monitors and budgets. Adding is not subtracting. In short: Her risk is at home, his is everywhere else. Protect both.

Question 9

"The UN is mostly men. Men voted for this."

Accepted Answer

True. The diplomatic corps has always been overwhelmingly male, only 7% of the UN's permanent representatives since 1947 have been women. Which proves the point, not the objection. Male-majority rooms created UN Women, CEDAW and thirteen women's days — because an organised movement put the ask on the table. Institutions answer asks, not the chromosomes of the people in the chairs. Nobody has yet put the men's ask on that table. That is what this page is for. In short: Male-majority rooms built UN Women. Rooms answer asks, not chromosomes.

Question 10

"Women organised for a century. Men just won't show up."

Accepted Answer

Also true, and worth saying plainly: women earned their machinery through a hundred years of organised, ridiculed, persistent work. Two things follow. First, the suffragettes were told to stop whining too — citing their example cuts the other way. Second, men are organising: Movember has raised over a billion dollars for men's health; Manderådet, MannsForum, AIBM and a dozen sister organisations exist; you are reading some of that organising right now. The ask is that institutions answer it the way they answered women's organising — not that anyone does it for us. In short: You are reading the organising. This page is it.

Question 11

"What about Afghanistan? It's triage — help the worst off first."

Accepted Answer

In Afghanistan, women's basic rights are being dismantled. Nothing on this page disputes that, and the work there deserves support. But the UN is not an emergency room with one bed. It runs hundreds of mandates at once — oceans, glaciers, press freedom, sanitation. Triage is the right frame inside a war zone. It is not the right frame for a system of 234 indicators that can watch everything except one group. A men's focal point in New York takes nothing from Kabul. In short: The UN is not one hospital bed. It can watch two things at once.

Question 12

"Family-court bias is a myth. Fathers just don't put the work in."

Accepted Answer

Custody law in most Western countries is formally gender-neutral, and outcomes partly reflect who did the caregiving before the split. 'Formally neutral' is exactly what data is for. If the courts are unbiased, gender-split custody and contact statistics would prove it — yet such statistics are rarely published at all. You cannot call a number a myth when nobody is assigned to produce the number. That is the loop from earlier, sitting in a courtroom. In short: If the courts are neutral, publishing the statistics costs nothing.

Question 13

"When women struggle it's the system; when men struggle it's their own choice. Pick one."

Accepted Answer

Consistency is a fair demand. One rule for everyone. Here is the one rule: when bad outcomes cluster in a group — by sex, by class, by anything — you collect the data and you check the system. That is exactly how women's disadvantage was established, and it is all we ask for men: the same lens, pointed both ways. What is not consistent is calling the same clustering 'systemic' in one column and 'personal choice' in the other. In short: One rule, both sexes: when outcomes cluster, check the system.

Question 14

"You just have a victim mindset. Stop whining."

Accepted Answer

Nobody admires grievance for its own sake — us included. Now flip the genders. Telling a woman who cites suicide statistics to 'stop complaining' would be recognised instantly as sexism, and rightly so. If a sentence only works when aimed at one sex, it is not an argument — it is a norm. And that particular norm, man up and shut up, is measured in the suicide column above. England aimed its first men's health strategy at exactly this: getting men to seek help, and services to expect them. In short: If it would be sexist said to a woman, it is not an argument against a man.

UN for Men Too

UN Women exists for a reason.

0 bn USD a year.

For scale